In Defense of Facebook
April 4, 2019
The ebb and flow of data privacy breaches which Facebook has become the loth grand
ambassador of has prompted many to both reflect and have qualms about the nature of data
that they share with their friends. A spate of global lampooning or admonishment has
consumed our beloved social network over the past several months, which is now ostensibly
mired in yet another controversy as the Wall Street Journal recently unfurled another set of
fresh allegations accusing it of illicitly receiving intimate data of users from apps on their
smartphones without their consent to heighten the advertising experience for both businesses
and end users.
However, given the laundry list of problems (like harmful content, fake news, election
manipulation, etc.) plaguing Facebook and flustering conservative consumers worldwide,
there is really nothing new under the sun, sotospeak. In this editorial, I have argued that
elevating Facebook to some sort of a global poster boy of data breaches, or a doomy symbol
of pressaging future regulations, or lastly and less importantly, fantasizing the futility and
disdainfulness of how Mark Zuckerberg was interrogated (or rather, disparaged) by
Washington (and later the EU), is all both petty and unwarranted. All that has transpired by
reducing Facebook into a lightning rod or a soft target for desultory criticism is digression
from otherwise damning problems that the internet is presently rife with.
First, consider this quote from the celebrated play Macbeth by Shakespeare: ‘Life is a tale
told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing’. Now in light of this, consider the
fact that Facebook is the largest social agglomeration of life having more than two billion
people peddling growth to its platform by virtually recreating pristine moments of their lives
everyday. However, it is this ‘sound and fury’ of life that spurs its audience into not
exercising abandon where required. Just like in Macbeth where Lady Macbeth conjures up
visions of irremovable bloodsoaked stains on her hands reflecting her sins of the past, our
moreorless mortifying and pernicious spurofthemoment follies make up the bread and
butter of other quotidian Facebook users’ experience. So, the fault unfortunately lies more
somewhere in it operating in the social networking market and less in the company per se.
Second, since Facebook operates on the same scale as any other tech mammoth, it is
unwarranted of anyone of us to sideline it for admonishment on the grounds of employing an
aggressive advertisement strategy when its competitors are busy doing the same. As Mark
Zuckerberg recently wrote in the Washington Post (to both placate concerned consumers and
allay speculations), government regulations are imperative to enact so as to level the playing
field for all companies. If Facebook becomes an ascetic by foregoing personalised
advertisements, another company would simply occupy its position and come under the line
of fire of watchdogs. The debate should deal with the nittygritty of the enactment of privacy
regulations and not with the behavior of an existing company toward it.
4/3/2019 Untitled document – Google Docs
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dV3CN-TG9APjliL7JgnGkFwTW39MwQRclcUCUt2F5J4/edit 2/2
Third, Facebook is scarcely alone in this whole privacy blunder. Google has also earlier been
party to exposing private information of users from their now defunct social network,
Google+. Apple, much to its own dismay, not so long ago inadvertently let users eavesdrop
facetime calls of others due to a bug, and a phalanx of topnotch third party apps are accused
on a daily basis of exposing sensitive user information (famous examples entail the fitness
app: myFitnesspal). Data has indisputably become the oil of the twentyfirst century, as the
Economist has rightly proclaimed, but this one is a type of oil that is unfortunately laced in
such an aura of scepticism that even its staunchest purveyors can’t seem to refine.
All told, we the students, on the other hand, are merely spectators in this filmy curtain of
ambiguities, skewed by our own outright nonchalance in the face of otherwise consumerism.
The demarcation of our abandon has amounted to nothing but increased consumption itself.
And in an attempt to bolster data privacy efforts, universities like ours have although
jettisoned their earlier lax behavior on data privacy and marshaled forces to educate the
student community at large by having them take an online course on it, but to what extent is
all this effective seems mostly unclear. What remains imperative, however, amidst everything
is that as we brainstorm ideas to advance technology, we must not forget to turn our attention
to the shift in privacy that is developing. Its high time that we cut Facebook some slack and
start accepting that what began with and made Snapchat a stellar success was not an
ephemeral and a millennial trend, but a muffled shoutout to privacy which has now found its
voice, and it is disturbingly loud.